Ambiguity in guideline definitions introduces assessor bias and influences consistency in IUCN Red List status assessments
نویسندگان
چکیده
1 College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK, 2 Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 3 Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, Centre for Wildlife Management, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 4 Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg, South Africa, 5 Panthera, New York, NY, USA, 6 Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 7 Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, Centre for Invasion Biology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 8 School of Biological Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
منابع مشابه
Commentary: IUCN classifications under uncertainty
We comment on a recent article by Newton (Environ. Model. Softw. (2010), 25, 15-23), which proposed a method, based on a Bayesian belief networks, for classifying the threat status of species under the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, and compared this method to an earlier one that we had developed that is based on fuzzy logic. There are three types of differences between the results of t...
متن کاملA practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.
The newly developed IUCN Red List of Ecosystems is part of a growing toolbox for assessing risks to biodiversity, which addresses ecosystems and their functioning. The Red List of Ecosystems standard allows systematic assessment of all freshwater, marine, terrestrial and subterranean ecosystem types in terms of their global risk of collapse. In addition, the Red List of Ecosystems categories an...
متن کاملConR: An R package to assist large‐scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data
The Red List Categories and the accompanying five criteria developed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) provide an authoritative and comprehensive methodology to assess the conservation status of organisms. Red List criterion B, which principally uses distribution data, is the most widely used to assess conservation status, particularly of plant species. No software pa...
متن کاملAnalysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments
Two processes for regional environmental assessment are currently underway: the Global Environment Outlook (GEO) and Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Both face constraints of data, time, capacity, and resources. To support these assessments, we disaggregate three global knowledge products according to their regions and subregions. These products are: Th...
متن کاملClarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List.
The identification of species at risk of extinction is a central goal of conservation. As the use of data compiled for IUCN Red List assessments expands, a number of misconceptions regarding the purpose, application and use of the IUCN Red List categories and criteria have arisen. We outline five such classes of misconception; the most consequential drive proposals for adapted versions of the c...
متن کامل